Mga tanong na di masagot:
- Who initiated the articles of impeachment?
- When it was completed?
- Is the articles accompanied with evidence?
Source: https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2085198/house-wont-reply-to-3-sc-queries-on-impeach-raps
Mga tanong na di masagot:
1 Like
haha supalpal na naman sila ng supreme court
hahahahahaha gagawin pa silang witness ni Marcoleta kung may Impeachment trial na talaga tapos ang hihina hahahaha
probing questions lang naman yan to ensure na nasunod ang constitution eh saka yes or no lang din, baka nahiya lang talaga sila sumagot ng yes it is accompanied with evidence haha kasi alam na nila kasunod na tanong
1 Like
The House, through the Office of the Solicitor General, argued that these matters pertain to its internal proceedings, which are beyond the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction due to the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution. Therefore, the House did not provide answers to these specific questions, including those about who initiated the articles, when they were completed, and whether they were accompanied by evidence.
Maliwanag naman nakasaad sa report.
In all of the SC questions, ito lang tatlo ang hnidi masagot ng House.
The House of Representatives answered all but three inquiries of the Supreme Court on the impeachment complaints against Vice President Sara Duterte, maintaining that these matters refer to the internal deliberations of the chamber, which, it argued, are outside of the high court’s jurisdiction.
yeah ito lang di masagot since ito ang pinaka petition ni Sara (constitutionality), hindi nasunod ang tamang proceedings sa pag hain ng impeachment, lalo na’t yung spox nila sa election nagsabi na hindi evidence ang basis ng kanilang mga pirma
haha i don’t think magiging issue pa ang jurisdiction if meron naman evidence ang articles of impeachment haha
Hahaha ino-oversimplify mo nman ulit. Jurisdiction issue stems from the House’s interpretation of its exclusive authority over impeachment processes (Article XI, Section 3), not solely the presence or absence of evidence.
pausible but remains speculative ika nga.
di ko naman sinabi na invalid ang argument nila haha ang argument ko is no need na nila i-raise ang jurisdiction issue kung meron naman evidence na attached doon sa articles of impeachment, at mas lalong no need na din mag tanong si supreme court about evidence if nakikita na mismo ng mga judges ang attached evidences sa articles haha
Kahit may evidence, puwede nilang sabihin na wala dapat pakialam ang Supreme Court dito dahil separation of powers. At hindi rin totoo na hindi na kailangan magtanong ang SC tungkol sa evidence, kailangan nila i-verify ang process dahil sa petition ni Sara Duterte, at wala namang ebidensya na malinaw nilang nakita based sa document.
of course pwede pa rin haha yung point ko lang naman is if meron naman naka attach na evidence then what is holding them pa para sumagot ng yes haha